patelsam1996
Question 11 pts   Ibbotson and Kaplan (2000) study would most…

Question 11 pts

 

Ibbotson and Kaplan (2000) study would most likely support which statement?

Group of answer choices

About 90% of variability among funds is explained by policy

 

Almost 100% of variability of returns in time is explained by policy

 

Active security selection and market timing explain around 10% of variability of returns in time

 

About 40% of variability of returns in time is explained by policy

 

 

Flag question: Question 2Question 21 pts

 

The main finding from Xiong, Ibbotson, Idzorek, and Chen (2010) is most likely that

Group of answer choices

The decision to invest (be in the market) is the single most important decision

 

The interaction among the three decisions has substantial explanatory power to explain returns

 

Asset allocation and Active management together dominate the variation in returns

 

The asset allocation decision accounts for the largest share of variability of returns.

 

 

Flag question: Question 3Question 31 pts

 

All of the following are limitations of the Multiple Scenario Analysis strategy EXCEPT:

Group of answer choices

The results are too uncertain to be useful in practice 

 

Difficult to estimate multiple scenarios

 

Fine-tuning of quantitative process could be subject to judgement heuristics

 

Compounding uncertainty of multiple scenarios

 

 

Flag question: Question 4Question 41 pts

 

For an investor with a portfolio consisting of 50% long-term bonds and 50% common stocks, how long should the investment be held in order to have no expected losses (over that holding period)?

Group of answer choices

Between 5 and 10 years

 

Above 20 years.

 

Under 5 years as exemplified by the rule “5 years, 5 years, 5 years”

 

Between 10 and 20 years

 

 

Flag question: Question 5Question 51 pts

 

The main critique of the BHB (1995) study as outlined in Hensel, Ezra, and Ilkiw (1990) was that:

Group of answer choices

There was no rebalancing done to the portfolio

 

The quarterly rebalances was done inappropriately

 

The BHB portfolio inappropriately started as ‘all cash’

 

BHB incorrectly included some corporate bonds in their initial portfolio

 

 

Flag question: Question 6Question 61 pts

 

To compute the impact of the investment policy and timing decisions on portfolio performance Brinson, Hood, and Beebower (1995) used

Group of answer choices

performance of the actual portfolio

 

Benchmark returns weighted by the actual allocation for that time period

 

Weighted average of benchmark returns

 

The product of normal policy weights and actual returns for each asset class

 

 

Flag question: Question 7Question 71 pts

 

Which of the following is true regarding the impact of Security selection and Market timing decisions on portfolio performance as identified by Brinson, Hood, and Beebower (1995)?

Group of answer choices

Security selection contributed to extra 0.67% to portfolio returns

 

Market timing lost over 1% on average per year

 

Market timing was twice as profitable as Security selection

 

The losses to Market timing were almost twice as bad as the losses to Security selection

 

 

Flag question: Question 8Question 81 pts

 

Which of the following statements about the three most important determinants of portfolio returns, identified in Brinson, Hood, and Beebower (1995), is most likely correct?

Group of answer choices

Asset class selection is as important as security selection

 

Market timing decision has higher contribution to profits than Active security selection

 

The selection of asset classes and their normal weights is much more important than security selection

 

Active security selection decision is as important as the market timing decision

 

 

Flag question: Question 9Question 91 pts

 

All of the following are valid criticisms of Asset Allocation EXCEPT:

Group of answer choices

Asset allocation models often use unsubstantiated input which leads to unrealistic expectations

 

Allocation models are based solely on historical data

 

Asset allocation models use projections (forward-looking expectations) instead of actual returns

 

Asset allocation models ignore ‘black swans’.

 

 

Flag question: Question 10Question 101 pts

 

All of the following were the asset classes used in the original study by Brinson, Hood, and Beebower (1995) EXCEPT:

 

Group of answer choices

Bonds

 

Common Stocks

 

Real Estate

 

Cash