BailiffOstrich347
Chosen country is Haiti and chosen product is Lifestraw FDI…
Chosen country is Haiti and chosen product is Lifestraw
FDI Pestle Analysis TEAM Project Slides Presentation
Assume you and your team members are all director-level employees in the of the Global Business Development department for a new social entrepreneurship enterprise (you choose the name!) that is focused on selling your chosen product in your chosen country.
The Chief Strategy Officer (CSO) of your company, Clara Scott-Owens, has asked for you and your team to create a presentation that you will give (verbal and presentation slides) to the Board of Directors of your company.
In that presentation, you will need to do the following:
provide an overview of the product and why it would be helpful in your chosen country;
PESTLE analysis (the viability of investing in your chosen country). You will outline the elements of PESTLE to give a bird’s eye view of the opportunity. You will address questions like these:
Does the country offer a growing and strong market for consumer products?
Is the government stable?
Is the economy stable?
Are the legal, political, and economic institutions transparent?
Have any reforms been effective?
Do you have any concerns?
Provide your team’s recommendation on which method of FDI would be most reasonable given the product and PESTLE analysis;
Address any BOP or other ethical issues;
Present at least two NGOs that may be of assistance to your company in delivering your product to your country.
To upload your completed work, click on the Start Assignment button and then the Submit Assignment button.
Rubric
FDI PESTEL Team – 215
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical thinking demonstrated
125 to >112.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Makes use of the reading and additional resources to formulate original ideas and conclusions All concepts are presented with evidence to support Effectively and creatively questions, challenges, and reflects on information.
112 to >100.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Some resources used to formulate original ideas and conclusions Concepts are presented with evidence to support. Challenges some of the ideas or information presented.
100 to >75.0 pts
Partially Meets Expectations
Minor conclusions or ideas presented. Some supported with examples or evidence.
75 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Critical thinking lacking. Few conclusions or presented with little or no evidence or examples used.
125 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation Slides
30 to >27.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Slides are concise, well organized, graphics / charts/ illustrations are eye-catching, and direct.
27 to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Slides are organized well and are direct to the point. Some graphics used.
24 to >18.0 pts
Partially Meets Expectations
Slides have some organizational issues or are lacking conciseness, graphics, and meaning
18 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Slides are not organized well and are not relevant to the topic or point of the presentation.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics (Spelling, Grammar, Citations, References)
30 to >27.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Grammar, spelling, sentence structures are correct; Organized well; Citations and references are used correctly and in the proper format.
27 to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Minor grammar, spelling, sentence structures issues; or Minor issues with citations and references
24 to >18.0 pts
Partially Meets Expectations
Multiple grammar, spelling, and sentence structure issues; or major issues citations and references
18 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Major grammar, spelling, and sentence structure issues; and major issues with citations or references
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeamwork Demonstrated
30 to >27.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Ideas represent good team integration and are seamless.
27 to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Most ideas represent team consistency and maturity
24 to >18.0 pts
Partially Meets Expectations
Some ideas lack team cohesion and consistency throughout
18 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Teamwork not evident; concepts presented are disjointed, separate
