SuperDiscovery12778 Hello, I need to give feedback on the post below. Can you assist me…Hello, I need to give feedback on the post below. Can you assist me and also include a question to ask this person: Discuss the principal problems involved in defining employee crime and measuring its scope accuratelyIt is hard to define employee crime because there are multiple levels of crime within organizations and what is considered a crime. A crime could be easily identifiable by an employee like stealing money from a cash drawer or embezzeling money for years. A crime that is not easily identifiable is when an employee is using business time or profit for personal gain. There are questionable things like laziness and working slow to cause loss of profit, or using a business phone or computer for personal matters. Those things almost don’t seem like crime, but perhaps to the employer it is when you consider the losses they are incurring over long periods of time. On higher levels of corporate employment, it may be a question over using insider information on stocks, or using the company car for personal errands. There is such a wide range of questionable crimes that are hard to define.  Which forms of employee crime are most harmful, and which are least harmful? Embezzelment is one of the most harmful forms of employee crimes outside of other white collar crimes. Embezzelers have cost millions to billions of dollars of lost money to companies. Petty crimes done by employees, and probably the least harmful, are things like using the company car or phone, or making “too much” food and eating it without charge. Those are examples of low level crimes that hurt the company and others the least amount. Although those crimes can add up over a significant amount of time, they can’t compare the harm of embezzeling from the company for years. Identify the main factors that seem to promote a high level of employee crime and the main factors that influence employer response to it.There are many factors that can contribute to the motivation of high level crime from employees. There may be a desparity of money for a spouse or family member. There may be greed or low ethical standards involved as well. There seems to be a wide-range of motivation and reason to steal or embezzle. The employer response tends to be low with low level crimes and even higher level crimes, because they do not want to create bad reputation in the public eye. The employer is willing to dismiss small crimes like stealing food, in an act of justifying a low pay grade or work conditions. It’s not worth calling the police over something small. What did you learn from this chapter? Learning about medical fraud was very suprising to me. The amount of crime that physicians get involved in is hard to believe. I know that we sometimes have almost no choice but to believe medical advice from doctors, but its very frightening to find the statiscal amount of fraud going on behind the scenes. Doctors and dentists are performing unneccesary surgeries and over perscribing medications. It blew me away to read some of these numbers in the chapter. Especially things like people on Medicaid are twice as likely to have operations. That is very suggestive to me, and it feels like pharmaceutical companies and doctors are directly taking advantage of the low income people. BusinessBusiness – Other